NICEIC Area E


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

NICEIC Area E
NICEIC Area E
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Keywords

Latest topics
» I.T. system - medical locations
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptySun Dec 02, 2012 9:00 am by Andy B

» regulation 537.1.4
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyFri Sep 07, 2012 3:59 am by iant

» Flashing LED Lamps on Two Way Switched Circuits
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyThu Aug 23, 2012 8:26 am by terry gray

» The Long Lead (R2) Continuity Test for Periodic Inspections
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyWed Aug 22, 2012 5:31 pm by terry gray

» The Importance of Providing Layout Diagrams and Labelling
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyTue Aug 21, 2012 5:22 pm by terry gray

» Shocking experience whats the explanation?
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyTue Aug 21, 2012 8:51 am by Dunc

» Use of a Voltage Detector as a Means of Quickly Finding Unearthed Metalwork
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyTue Aug 21, 2012 6:25 am by terry gray

» Certificates
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyMon Aug 20, 2012 5:33 pm by terry gray

» Use of an A.C. Milli-Amp Clampmeter for Fault Finding Purposes
Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits EmptyWed Aug 15, 2012 8:39 am by terry gray

May 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar

Affiliates
free forum

Affiliates
free forum


Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits

Go down

Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits Empty Disconnection Times for Inverter Circuits

Post by terry gray Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:58 am

A matter has been raised recently from the Technical Helpline where a contractor undertaking an Electrical Installation Condition Report has failed the system as not meeting the requirements of BS 7671: 2001 in terms of disconnection times for fault or additional protection. The inverter circuit was found to be fed from a general consumer unit with other final circuits covered by a D.P. RCD. The concern was that the disconnection time of the RCD under fault conditions would be compromised by the inverter, which in theory could take up to 5 seconds to shut down on interuption of supply.

This shut down period will normally exceed the disconnection times stipulated in BS 7671 for additional protection and the inverter will continue to produce an output voltage between Line and Neutral only for the shutdown period. This is provided there is no connection between N - E in the D.B. due to a fault, or a resistance path though a component fed from other connected circuits protected by the RCD - obviously, this situation is difficult to guarantee. Please see page 14 of the ESC's Best Practice Guide 3, on Microgeneration which states that any RCD protecting the Solar pv circuit has to be double pole and shows a diadram illustrating the problems associated with an N-E fault.

To provide a safer solution, it is considered best practice for the Solar pv inverter circuit to be fed from a dedicated consumer unit via a double pole breaker, or alternatively kept separate from other circuits on the non-RCD protected side of the general consumer unit.


Last edited by terry gray on Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:39 pm; edited 3 times in total (Reason for editing : Update)

terry gray

Posts : 16
Join date : 2012-02-29

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum